Mortgage
Company Charging Fees for
Preparation of Legal Instruments.
Inquiry:
A mortgage company prepares instruments used in first
and second trust lending and charges the borrower the
reasonable costs of preparing those instruments. It
makes those charges in accordance with Virginia Code
§6.1-330.70, which permits a lender to require
the borrower to pay the reasonable and necessary charges
in connection with making the loan, including the cost
of title examination, title insurance, recording and
filing fees, taxes, insurance, including mortgage guaranty
insurance, appraisals, credit reports, surveys, drawing
of papers and closing the loan.
The
inquiry requests a reconciliation of Virginia Code §6.1-330.70
with Unauthorized Practice Rule 6-103(A)(4), which indicates
that [a] lending institution may in the regular
course of conducting its business prepare a deed of
trust or mortgage on real estate securing the payments
of its loan, for which no separate charge shall be made.
Opinion:
The Committee believes the Unauthorized practice Rule
cited is totally consistent with the language of the
statute. A lender may require the borrower to pay these
charges or it may pay them itself as is
the case in many equity loans today. However, in either
case, the parties receiving payment would be restricted
to those legally entitled to make such charges.
Therefore,
the lender or borrower would pay survey charges to the
surveyor, title examination charges to the lawyer, title
insurance premiums and binder fees to the title company,
recording and filing fees to the Clerk, credit report
and appraisal fees to the lender, etc.
Thus,
in the case of legal instruments as defined in UPC 6-4,
if the lender is going to prepare them, then it must
do so without a separate charge. Otherwise, it is a
non-lawyer practicing law outside the exceptions
to the unauthorized practice prohibition of UPR 6-103(A).
[See UPL
Op. No. 94]
Summary:
It is the unauthorized practice of law for a mortgage
company to make a separate charge for the preparation
of instruments affecting title to real estate in connection
with a real estate mortgage closing. The committee notes
that the Virginia Code §6.1-330.70 directs that
the company may require the borrower to pay expenses
reasonably related to the transaction; however, the
parties receiving payment must be restricted to those
who are legally entitled to make such charges. In the
case of title instruments as defined in UPC 6-4, if
the lender prepares them, it must do so without a separate
charge. To the extent that this opinion, UPL Opinion
No. 94 and UPL Opinion No. 109 are inconsistence with
UPL Opinion No. 69, UPL Opinion No. 69 is hereby overruled.
[UPR 6-103(A); UPL Op. 94]
Approved
by the Supreme Court of Virginia
September 21, 1989
Effective
January 1, 1990